<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Stamp-in-the-Box</title>
	<link>http://stamp-in-the-box.com</link>
	<description>(a letterboxing site from springchick)</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Missing Boxes by springchick</title>
		<link>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2008/08/05/missing-boxes/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>springchick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2008/08/05/missing-boxes/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Even though it is oft reported to be missing, the "Welcome to Michigan" box is safe and sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though it is oft reported to be missing, the &#8220;Welcome to Michigan&#8221; box is safe and sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on Letterboxing by Familyof6</title>
		<link>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2009/11/29/random-thoughts-on-letterboxing/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Familyof6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2009/11/29/random-thoughts-on-letterboxing/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Great observations, and I too have been guilty of some and have been pulling some of my boxes because of this. I especially agree with the "sticks behind the tree" thing (It seems I've been finding LOTS of these lately!). Really though, I'm a snob about a good clue and a great hand-carved stamp. It's my drug...my own little piece of crack. Hey! I admit it! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great observations, and I too have been guilty of some and have been pulling some of my boxes because of this. I especially agree with the &#8220;sticks behind the tree&#8221; thing (It seems I&#8217;ve been finding LOTS of these lately!). Really though, I&#8217;m a snob about a good clue and a great hand-carved stamp. It&#8217;s my drug&#8230;my own little piece of crack. Hey! I admit it! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boxing Report: Goddard SP by Familyof6</title>
		<link>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2009/11/28/boxing-report-goddard-state-park/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Familyof6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2009/11/28/boxing-report-goddard-state-park/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Well, at least you didn't find any bones. Glad you had a great time visiting family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least you didn&#8217;t find any bones. Glad you had a great time visiting family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on Letterboxing by Atom118</title>
		<link>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2009/11/29/random-thoughts-on-letterboxing/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Atom118</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2009/11/29/random-thoughts-on-letterboxing/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Wonderful observations.  I think I agree with all of them, and yes, I'm guilty of a few, as well.

Recently we've been giving these, and other points, alot more thought as we seem to find alot more poorly planted boxes and hikes.  As for point 2, I think there is a linked contradiction.  A 4 mile series of 4 boxes will be less popular than 4 drive-bys in the most random areas (on a map or otherwise) even if it requires driving around and about for an additional hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful observations.  I think I agree with all of them, and yes, I&#8217;m guilty of a few, as well.</p>
<p>Recently we&#8217;ve been giving these, and other points, alot more thought as we seem to find alot more poorly planted boxes and hikes.  As for point 2, I think there is a linked contradiction.  A 4 mile series of 4 boxes will be less popular than 4 drive-bys in the most random areas (on a map or otherwise) even if it requires driving around and about for an additional hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Random Thoughts on Letterboxing by TrailTroll</title>
		<link>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2009/11/29/random-thoughts-on-letterboxing/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>TrailTroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2009/11/29/random-thoughts-on-letterboxing/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>I agree with everything you said!  I am also guilty of having a few neglected boxes - I don't have near as many plants as you do, but some of my far-away boxes need more attention than I'm willing to give.  I've retired a couple, and there are some more on the chopping block.

Great observations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everything you said!  I am also guilty of having a few neglected boxes - I don&#8217;t have near as many plants as you do, but some of my far-away boxes need more attention than I&#8217;m willing to give.  I&#8217;ve retired a couple, and there are some more on the chopping block.</p>
<p>Great observations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boxing Report: Goddard SP by TrailTroll</title>
		<link>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2009/11/28/boxing-report-goddard-state-park/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>TrailTroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2009/11/28/boxing-report-goddard-state-park/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a discouraging trip - but all too common findings.  I'm glad you kept your perspective and still enjoyed the day on the trail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a discouraging trip - but all too common findings.  I&#8217;m glad you kept your perspective and still enjoyed the day on the trail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome to Michigan! by springchick</title>
		<link>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2005/07/16/welcome-to-michigan/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>springchick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2005/07/16/welcome-to-michigan/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Status Update: This box is indeed active and was recently found on 11/25/09.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Status Update: This box is indeed active and was recently found on 11/25/09.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seagull Shadows by Anne</title>
		<link>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2002/08/03/seagull-shadows/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2002/08/03/seagull-shadows/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Visiting Hoffmaster this week.  Are Seagull Shadows and Spirit of the Dunes the same box?  different clues? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visiting Hoffmaster this week.  Are Seagull Shadows and Spirit of the Dunes the same box?  different clues? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spring Fling by Carly</title>
		<link>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2003/04/13/spring-fling/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Carly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2003/04/13/spring-fling/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Hello I was out looking for "Spring Fling" today and got a little confused half way through. Has anyone checked it latley? 
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello I was out looking for &#8220;Spring Fling&#8221; today and got a little confused half way through. Has anyone checked it latley?<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Silver Circus by Danielle</title>
		<link>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2006/11/04/silver-circus/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stamp-in-the-box.com/2006/11/04/silver-circus/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Went to print this clue today &#38; was disappointed to see it has been retired.  We had been waiting for a lazy Sunday afternoon to go in search of it.  Would love to see it brought out of retirement.  Thank you for all you do.
The Woodland Creatures</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Went to print this clue today &amp; was disappointed to see it has been retired.  We had been waiting for a lazy Sunday afternoon to go in search of it.  Would love to see it brought out of retirement.  Thank you for all you do.<br />
The Woodland Creatures</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
